A Change of Guard

សូមស្តាប់វិទ្យុសង្គ្រោះជាតិ Please read more Khmer news and listen to CNRP Radio at National Rescue Party. សូមស្តាប់វីទ្យុខ្មែរប៉ុស្តិ៍/Khmer Post Radio.
Follow Khmerization on Facebook/តាមដានខ្មែរូបនីយកម្មតាម Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/khmerization.khmerican

Friday 13 February 2015

Spokesman talks about book [Well, if we believe what's written in this article, Ek Tha seems to be an independent-minded government spokesman]

Ek Tha talks to the Post
Ek Tha, talks to the Post yesterday morning in Phnom Penh about his new book.Vireak Mai
Over the past 25 years, Ek Tha has worn many hats – UN interpreter, Reuters journalist, government spokesman, vocal believer in extraterrestrial life.
Now, he’s adding author to that list.
This week, Tha – an ebullient 44-year-old who was known as Ek Madra when he worked as a full-time journalist – released a monograph examining Cambodia in the Cold War decades that led to the Khmer Rouge.
While the topic is not new, Tha hopes to provide a Cambodian perspective of what occurred during those much-studied decades without the political biases that he says so often colour local writing about the Kingdom’s recent history.
“I want to prove to global audiences that in the past, for decades and decades, many foreign authors have written books and books about Cambodian history, and now it’s time for Cambodian people to tell about our political culture,” he said in an interview yesterday.
While Tha continues to work as deputy press director at the Council of Ministers, he insists that his work, which is available at Monument Books, is independent and impartial, even in its analysis of contemporary developments.
“I do not belong to any political party. I am an independent researcher.… I try to bring the facts,” he said.
Although some may find that hard to believe from a current government official, Tha’s self-published book, The Factors Contributing to Cambodia’s Civil War 1950s-1980s: Lessons Then & Now, breaks the ruling party’s line on a number of issues.

He refers to the factional fighting of 1997 as a “coup”, despite longtime government protestations to the contrary, and asserts that “rampant graft”, as under Prince Sihanouk in the 1960s, continues to exist today.
In a section of photos and comments that form a sort of epilogue, he makes no secret of his divergent opinions on certain issues, such as the controversial refugee resettlement scheme between Cambodia and Australia. He says the deportation of 20 Uighur asylum seekers to China in 2009 was “to gain Beijing’s support”.
In a section that discusses the role the internet played in the Arab Spring uprisings and Cambodia’s much-feared draft cybercrime law, Tha cryptically states that “if leaders claim to be democrats, they have to be seen as democrats”.
He said this was a general comment and not directed at the CPP.
Still, the eccentric Tha – who told the Post in 2014 that he has been researching alien life for the past two years – is already buckling down on a “political novel” tracing a Cambodian love story during the Cold War.
In later planned-for books, he says he will raise issues of deforestation, land evictions and corruption.
But he insists this “personal research” work is completely separate from his government press job.
“I have no fear.… After all these years, Ek Tha is still Ek Madra.”

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

I will not read the damned book . This guy makes me sick

Kim Ea said...

I praise you, who have courage to dug deep to the real event in the past and dare to tell the truth . Most writers Khmer or foreigner, they mostly bend to political pressure or look to the face of dictatorship leader first before writing something . Some time they subjugate just part of truthful event and the rest is manipulation in favor to get sympathizer to the ruling . Some foreigner writer depend mostly on the word of their interpreter, if the interpreter is a good and independent, have a gut to say the right fact, the writer can heard the truth, if the Khmer interpreter is belong to any political mindset they will told a different version, and the whole story is haft truth and halt manipulation fact . Please let's Khmer can have more truthful fact than the faking one .

Anonymous said...

i would not read this guy's book because defends the indefensible . He thinks he is some kind of wise guy that his job is different from what ever he labels himself as. only a crook and unconscionable can for ah wkak.